Capital punishment -- the death penalty Basic reasons that people give to support or oppose the death penalty Sponsored link. Common reasons in support of capital punishment The Bible: The Bible requires the death penalty for a wide variety of crimes, including practicing evil sorcery, adultery, some form of homosexual behavior, doing work on Saturday, women but not men who are non-virgins when they marry, people who try to persuade others to change their religion from the only approved state religion, murder, etc. It even calls for some criminals e.
Pro and Con The Death Penalty: Pro and Con Introduction Officially, thousands of people are sentenced to death every year in countries where the death penalty is practiced. Given the prevalence of the death penalty in the modern world, it is fair to assume that there are perhaps justifications for it, though there are plenty of people who categorically oppose it.
Without going into the details of any given judicial system, there are number of reasons to support both sides of the argument. Pro There are a number of practical arguments made for the death penalty.
Because the death penalty is such a powerful construct, many argue that it decreases crime rates through deterrence. Criminals rarely think about the consequences of their actions and this is especially true with crimes of passion. By killing felons, the death penalty removes the burden of housing them within the penitentiary system.
Prison overcrowding and overstretched resources are key issues in prisons in many countries.
And if they were paroled, there is always the chance they could re-offend, which is completely eliminated with the death penalty. The concept of retribution, that the perpetrator is punished in a manner fitting to the crime, is also used to support the death penalty.
Con There are many arguments against the death penalty that are both practical and ethical. It is very difficult to know the exact moral status of the death penalty, though many see it to be a degrading, barbaric, and amoral. The opponents of the death penalty argue that it causes incredible suffering and pain for the sentenced and brutalizes society as a whole where it operates.
Both of these factors could have negative effects on crime and criminality. The vast majority of people would at least argue that human life is highly valuable and should be preserved, though the extent at which preservation should make-way for retribution is where things become very debatable.
Misconduct in institutional systems can also lead to incorrect sentencing. While this is bad enough for non-death sentencing, these constitute a heinous breach of justice if the death penalty is involved. A psychological argument that may become prominent in the future is the concept of self-control and free will.
Do we have free will or not? If not, this could bring into question not just the death penalty but all forms of sentencing whether it is capital punishment or not. New neurological research can now predict the likelihood of someone becoming violent and may help with future awareness on these issues.
More importantly, there appears to be a general reduction in the number of death sentences even in the countries continuing to uphold the death penalty. Conclusion It is arguable that countries still using the death penalty do so purely in response to criminality and try to deter future criminals with it.
Ironically, many of the countries that have the death penalty suffer from higher crime rates. The death penalty does not cause the problem but it is merely a response to it. And while the death penalty is usually implemented by autocracy or religious doctrine, it is almost never used in response to actual modern societal values.
Therefore, the case against the death penalty is much stronger than the case for it. This would be the same for anyone who believes that ethics are more important than any of the possible practical benefits.There is no question that the up front costs of the death penalty are significantly higher than for equivalent LWOP cases.
There also appears to be no question that, over time, equivalent LWOP cases are much more expensive - from $ to $ million - than death penalty . The goal of Sudoku is to fill in a 9×9 grid with digits so that each column, row, and 3×3 section contain the numbers between 1 to 9.
At the beginning of the game, the 9×9 grid will have some of the squares filled in. Publisher of academic books and electronic media publishing for general interest and in a wide variety of fields.
Death penalty laws can be traced back as far as the 18th century B.C., when the code of King Hammaurabi of Babylon established death as the penalty for 25 different crimes. We will write a custom essay sample on The Death Penalty Pro/con specifically for you for only $ $/page.
Order now We have essays on the following topics that may be of interest to you. Murder (), Death Penalty (79) send me this sample. send me this sample. Death penalty opponents however feel that the death penalty actually leads to an increase in crime because the death penalty desensitizes people to violence, and it sends the message that violence is a suitable way to resolve conflicts.