Critical Thinking Course Coordinator: In the first part of this paper I will represent my personal opinion and try to convince the reader that Socrates was innocent. In the second part of this work I will try to look from perspective of people living at the time when Socrates trail was conducted.
Most of the information that we learn about Socrates comes from the work and writings of one of his students, Plato. It has been alleged that the great Philosopher wrote nothing down for others to read, and as such, the knowledge and the teachings from Socrates that is relied upon to convey his philosophy and the epic story of his life comes not from himself, but his students who attempt to provide and accurate picture of the methods and philosophical beliefs held by their mentor and teacher.
The Apology is one of the many written dialogues written by Plato that discuss how Socrates was arrested and charged with corrupting the youth of Athens; teaching them and talking tot hem about his beliefs including and probably most damaging that he did not belief in God, per se, and considered himself an Atheist.
As one of the greatest philosophers to shape the study of Philosophy today, Socrates questioned everything and believed nothing until he could prove that there was no other logical answer.
Personally, I do not believe that it is possible for one man to corrupt the youth of an entire population, however, this is what he was charged with, and ultimately convicted of in an Athenian court of law. Although there was a court of law, as we read about in many of the Philosophy and History teachings, for someone to overtly stated that there was no God, was a punishable offense.
Socrates, a traveling teacher as he liked to call himself, questioned and challenged everyone he met and everything he heard.
Also, a Sophist, he did not believe that nature or reason could be depended on to tell people why the world was the way it was. Sophists contend that people stay in their own worlds and each have their own personal belief system and that in order to discover why the world was they way it was one must question the answer and argue the question until there is no other logical rationale.
Given this way of thinking, Socrates, as told by Plato, is unable to justify this logic of his charges because he does not believe that one person can ultimately control the minds, and beliefs of a population.
Today, to actually believe that someone could be sentenced to death, simply because of the way he viewed the world is completely insane. Everyone has their own beliefs, their own ideas, their own value system; and we are taught from a very young age that these are all very good qualities that should be attained by everyone.
Looking back at the historical time that this took place its clear to me why, put into context, that this happened. His questions were objective in nature and based on understanding the concepts such as love, justice, and other basic principles that his arguments questioned about ones life and beliefs.
He believed that all the so called bad beliefs and actions were the result of ignorance on the part of each individual and not their intent to harm another purposefully. Socrates also contested that having knowledge was what ones virtuousness was based on and people who are taught right and know right will act right; likewise, people who are taught bad, and know bad will act bad.
In The Apology Plato explains Socrates mission as a philosopher, which is to make people understand that "No one is wise than you. However, his defense lacked meaning for the jurors and was met with disbelief.
Plato, himself, wonders if Socrates in a sense, was his own worst enemy by making statements contrary, stating that he had attained a type of wisdom that the jurors lacked and that was a solid awareness of his own ignorance and lack of knowledge.
The goal of Socrates never ending questions, it appears, is to help the common person achieve the self knowledge that he had acquired, even if it ended up hurting himself in the end. He attempts to use his Sophist thinking in his defense, not understanding himself that this way of logically thinking rarely if ever is successful unless you are speaking with, or arguing against shares your way of thinking and philosophy.
Although, I truly believe that the death sentence was barbaric and unnecessary, it really was Socrates who determined his own fate. Even after his conviction he refused to sway from his philosophical ideologies and belief system.
Given the choice of being exiled from Athens or committing himself to abandon his techniques of talking with and questioning others openly, he maintained that and "unexamined life is not worth living," Apology 38a and would rather die that not practice and teach his Philosophy to others.
There are none of us today, that will ever be presented with such a dilemma to decide upon. However, as a student of Philosophy and a true believer in standing beside your beliefs regardless of the consequence, I do wonder what decision I would have made.
What we choose, ultimately tells the true devotion to our own philosophical belief system and how we live our lives. It has been alleged that the great Philosopher wrote nothing down for others to read, and as such, the knowledge and the teachings from Socrates that is relied upon to convey his philosophy and the epic story of his life comes not from himself, but his students who attempt to provide and accurate picture of the methodsAthenians sentenced Socrates to death for being found guilty of corrupting the youth and for not believing in Athens gods.
In the trial, Socrates entertained and addressed two sets of accusations: the old accusations and the new accusations.
Socrates was accused of many things but he was not guilty of corrupting the youth. He was a dangerous man as are all men of change are.
Martin Luther King Jr. was a man of change. He wanted people to change their belief of how blacks should be treated. Martin Luther King Jr was put to death.
Socrates: Not Guilty Intro () In BC, when he was seventy years old, Socrates was called into court by three men: Meletus, a poet, Anytus, a politician, and Lycon, an orator.
The specific charges were impiety (namely that he did not believe in the gods of Athens, and instead had introduced new gods), and corruption of the youth of the city. The Apology of Socrates: Guilty or Innocent?
Essay - The Apology of Socrates: Guilty or Innocent. In any case of law, when considering truth and justice, one must first look at the validity of the court and the system itself.
Nov 29, · was socrates guilty of corrupting the youth essay Геннадий Мишутин. Socrates: Guilty or Innocent Essay Words | 4 Pages In Plato's, The Apology of Socrates, Socrates was accused and on trial for two charges: that he had corrupted the youth of Athens with his teachings, and, that he advocated the worship of false gods. Feb 08, · Was socrates guilty of corrupting the youth and believing in false gods? i have to write and essay on this and it sounds more like a book report looking for ideas to add. ThanksStatus: Resolved.
In Socrates' case, the situation is no different. In B.C.E, a jury of Athenians sentenced Socrates to death for being found guilty of corrupting the youth and for not believing in Athens gods. In the trial, Socrates entertained and addressed two sets of accusations: the old accusations and the new accusations.
Was socrates guilty of corrupting the youth essay. 5 stars based on 85 reviews ashio-midori.com Essay. Was socrates guilty of corrupting the youth essayRate this post (Read 1 time today. Please share with your friends or comment below.)Comments comments" /> Facebook Twitter Google+ Pinterest Ikea swot analysis essays of salvador.